Together

Being principally opposed to homosexuality, made it difficult to fully embrace the Swedish film Together (Tillsammans), which tells the story of a broken family, set in the final days of free living and free love. Elisabeth flees to her brother, Goran's commune from an abusive, alcoholic husband. She brings her two children into a volatile situation as the social experiment known as Tillsammans is struggling under ideological differences, sexual awakening/confusion and doubt about the fundamental principles that brought these people together.

When Elisabeth and her family arrive, Goran is struggling with maintaining his insanity inside an open relationship with Lena, who is so open that she reveals she has experienced her first orgasm with her house mate, Erik, to Goran. Adding to the shock of their parents' break up, Elisabeth's children, Stefan and Eva enter the house upon a naked argument between the recently divorced, Lasse and Anna. Having recently coming to the realization that she is a lesbian, Anna is quick to take an interest in Elizabeth, while Lasse is half-assedly rejecting the same-sex advances of Klasse (both of whom are men, if that is not obvious by the Swedish names).

Tet, son of Anna and Lasse, takes to Stefan with interest, since he is the only male child in the house. Stefan quickly introduces Tet to war games and meat, which are both forbidden in the house. These disruptions turn out to be the last straw for the already frustrated couple, Signe and Sigvarde, parents of the other child in the house, Måne.

Elisabeth's other child, Eva, meanwhile is struggling with the usual insecurities of any thirteen year old, on top of the added stress of living amongst hippies. However she attracts the attention of a neighborhood boy, Fredrik, whose parents strongly despise their open-minded neighbors. However, Fredrik longs for human connection that his sexually frustrated mother and father will not provide. He develops a clumsy courtship of Eva, but struggles to solidify it, when the ever-promiscuous and perpetually drunk, Lena titillates him.

The childrens' father, Rolf, makes several inept and drunken attempts to win his family back, but finally turns a corner when he takes the advice of the divorced and lonely, Birger, who hopes to help Rolf to avoid his life's mistakes.

Despite any feelings of repulsion by male frontal nudity, I just found this ultimately optimistic film enthralling. The relationships that form in this film are all out of a need for human connection and they fulfill that need so well that it is difficult to quibble over the morality of them all. In the end this film simply warmed my heart and depicted the unique struggles and avail of communal living that fascinate me so much.

My Own Mind For A Change

I exercised my belief in epistemological modesty recently by reconsidering some long held beliefs. As is often the case I realized that these opinions I held so fervently in the past were not nearly as vital as I had originally believed. The first belief that I set adrift out into the endless ocean of supposition was the belief that people are born heterosexual. While I have spent a lot of time contemplating my belief that no one is born homosexual, it had never occurred to me that I would question former. However, after many years of reevaluating my larger theory of sexuality I found that this position was the weakest part. The conjecture that all human beings leave the womb with any sexual appetite goes against the experience of nearly everyone I know, which is why I am so surprised to realize how long I have held it without the slightest suspicion. I argued so hard for the view that we are hardwired heterosexual, because I believed that it was so integral to my belief that God disapproved. After all, why would God forbid the fulfillment of an appetite he had given us. But what if God has only merely hardwired us for the desire to be loved, to love and to manifest that love in physical ways, including sex?

Not only is this long held belief that boys are born liking girls and vise versa, one-sided against the the view that either boys like boys or girls like girls, it is also in direct contradiction with a belief that has helped explain many ethical and aesthetic conclusions: I believe tastes, as well as nearly every other attribute of our personality, is chosen by us. While many of these choices are made passively, they are, none the less, under our control. While most of us develop tastes that are nurtured in the environment in which we grow up and live, this is only out of convenience. Oddly enough, I had never thought to apply this principle to sexuality until now. I have often struggled with the fact that some people seem to have a natural appetite for members of their own gender, and this has, for some time caused me a great deal of distress in holding my belief that God does not want any us to indulge such an appetite.

I have asked God in my prayers with him and my engagements with his written word why he would condemn such actions and yet encourage love between all his creation. I have tried to imagine sex and romantic love as either two separate things or as inseparable as two sides of one coin. However now I believe now that sexuality is yet another taste that we foster from birth. Some choose the easiest and thereby most "natural" feeling decision. However, out of a sense of rebellion, through random experiences or due to the type intimacies that develop circumstantially between people, each individual makes his own sexuality. I do not believe that God grants us a sexual appetite from birth or at puberty. However, I do believe he has a plan. Whether that be for our best interest or merely his sovereign will or both is of little consequence. Regardless I believe that God has certain boundaries, within which he wishes us to reside as regards sexuality.

As far as the political implications of this position, I believe that I cannot in good conscience endorse a sexual relationship I believe to be immoral. Because of this conviction I will not vote in favor of legislation that legalizes same sex marriages. On the other hand, I do not believe it is my personal or divine mission to decide how people follow their sexual appetites. Most likely, I will abstain from a vote over such matters, or I will vote my conviction and accept the decision of the people of our country made directly or indirectly by way of representatives without further protest. I hope that people of all persuasions and opinions will respect the conclusions I draw from much earnest thought and prayer. I have decided that I will probably save my other change of heart and mind for another day. As this issue has been more taxing mentally than I originally anticipated.

Depression

Depression and I have never been strangers. However, I have never thought of it as much of a curse, but more an awareness that life is complicated. I have often found a great deal of comfort in my melancholy. Sometimes I have channeled it into creativity or fed it with music, films and books-stories of pain, loss and heartbreak. These have not fueled destructive behavior but provided comforting knowledge that I am not alone. The human condition is suffering. What the world calls a healthy psychological condition is more like denial, repression and naivety, all of which I have very little use for. I refuse to ignore that this condition is the unchangeable state of things. I enjoy what is worth enjoying, and everything else weighs on my heart like a ton of bricks. And I am fine with this, because I know there is little I can do about the evil in the world. I can pray. I can be good. I can even ask others to be good. What I cannot do is make anyone do anything.

When I see people, who are depressed over things that are beyond their control I feel that same weight on my heart. I wish I could do something. Sometimes, I even want to remind others that they have no control over that which does depress them. I want to tell them that they cannot make people stop hurting them. They cannot make people be sympathetic to their pain. They cannot undo the mistakes they have made. What they can control is how they react to suffering. They can hold onto the things that make them happy. They can cultivate relationships with the people who give them the strength to press on.

They can accept the unconditional love of a creator, not a higher power with a plan, but a loving father that feels their pain along with them. A father that will not judge their mistakes once they are confessed, but only wishes that they be acknowledged so that they may no longer be a source of shame or regret. This is someone, who aches at his core with the pain of the whole world like we all hurt for our friends and family closest to us when they have lost what feels like everything. For every child lost senselessly, for every home or livelihood destroyed by disaster, for every atrocity perpetrated in his or any other name he aches like we ache for those for whom we would die. The ones for whom we live to love.

For me, depression has never been about hopelessness, but about eliminating a hope for what will never be in this life. Struggle will not end, but joy can begin as soon as people can find out what to be happy about. Be happy about your freedom to determine your happiness. Be happy that you can love whoever you want as much as you want. Be content that no one can take away your ability to be content with nothing but grace.

Codeine

I have taken the last of Briana's codeine tonight, because I was feeling very aching and unable to get comfortable while I was reading. Briana has already chastised me before for taking this prescription drug unnecessarily. I cannot say that my experiences with it have been terribly psychedelic, but having accidentally mixed it with alcohol with a very surprising result I have remained curious. I have previously written a very bizarre poem accompanied by a self-portrait while inebriated one night. I do not have much memory of writing it, and the words left me in awe. It is probably my favorite thing I have ever wrote. So, when I started to feel light-headed tonight, it occurred to me that this might be a unique opportunity to write something unusual while under the influence of this controlled substance. My views on altered states has changed dramatically since my first-hand experience has increased somewhat. I used to hold the opinion that all actions done in an altered state were inauthentic, a lie. However, I have become more convince, at least in the case of alcohol, that one can be a great deal more honest while intoxicated. One's judgment as to what is appropriate behavior certainly becomes impaired, but the words that spill forth are more genuine and uninhibited by social awkwardness, which has always been a thorn in my side.

Alcohol often encourages me to get out of the self-imposed sound booth, which is my head. Too often I want to prepare my words so carefully that I end up not talking at all. I just continually edit my thoughts until the appropriate moment to share them passes or I merely feign indifference about whatever current topic of conversation has been introduced. I am, in fact, very opinionated, but I have neutered my intellect with an overzealous conviction that I should be humble. My pursuit of humility has made me passive to the point that I will not even give an honest answer to a straight forward question for fear that I come across as arrogant or pretentious. I must, as is usually the case, find a middle ground in which to live, while still holding true to my convictions and principals.

I have even bcome so terrified of putting my thoughts into words that it has prevented me from writing, which is a gift that I want to exercise more than nearly anything. I will end my vow of silence. I will cast aside my reservations at voicing my disapproval of things, while remembering to practice my sincere, empathetic listening abilities. I want to connect with all people. Tomorrow, I will boldy connect with those less fortunate than myself, but not so unfortunate as to not live in Milwaukee, WI.

I have held my tongue too long.
Kept all convictions a secret
Between God, myself and my wife
Acting as if my thoughts didn't merit
The attention of others
Or at least the chance to echo
In all their perfect ears
Whether pitch perfect or dissonant.
These ideas and opinions are mine.
Formed by reason and experience
My true volition realized
In thought, deed and finally word.
My voice is a gift
That I must not bury
For that master returneth
And my result he will judge
How will my efforts honor him
How will my talents have procreated
To create more gifts for the kingdom
More glory for our Redeemer
I may not shout from the rooftops
But I will wisper in bars
I will chatter in friends' homes
And send my words near and far
Write them out with a pencil
Expecting words in return
Words of careful reflection
Constructive criticism to help me learn
That while my ideas are my own
I should not be so stingy to keep them
Locked up in my mind for protection
Or fear that someone will change them
I want to learn to love my words
As Christ loves the church
Not because of what they are made of
But because of who can change them

The Wrestler

I have not seen Sean Penn's Oscar winning performance in Milk, but unless Penn actually took a bullet in the making of the film I do not see how he could have outdone Mickey Rourke in Darren Aronofsky's harrowing The Wrestler. Rourke is mesmerizing with his shear size and presence throughout the film. Aronofsky fills every frame with the broken giant and Roarke abliges him by creating a character with an aura that outshines even the most earnest of supporting performances, and this is a superb supporting cast. Rourkes character, Randy, is, as his daughter, Stephanie, played by Evan Rachel Wood, describes him, "a living, breathing fuck-up." He has been selfish, irresponsible and whole-heartedly single minded in his pursuit of success in professional wrestling. However, wrestling has not given nearly as much back, or, at least, not of the things most people count as truly important. Randy is alone in the autumn season of his life and while he has developed a sincere bond with, Pam, his favorite stripper, he struggles to push the relationship beyond business because of the sordid circumstance under which they have met. At the same time Randy hopes to repair the seemingly irreparable breach in his relationship with his daughter.

It becomes obvious by the end of this story that this is not a story of redemption, but of destiny. While I cannot agree with the thesis put forward by Aranofsky with this film, I cannot ignore that is a powerful story of warning to those who live for themselves, and singularly invest themselves in their work without regard for relationships or the consequences that come from such a life with blinders.

Jesus For President

According to Shane Claiborn and his co-writers, our allegiance to our country is incompatible to our allegiance to Christ. Christ asks that we be peace makers, but if we are to be peacemakers how can we perpetrate war and military occupation in 150 countries around the world. Jesus For President tells us by way of several church historians that early roman converts to Christianity gave up their positions of power both in the Roman military and regular political office. Claiborne makes a good point that these Christians could not take part in the imperial enterprise of Rome, however, the question as to whether America is Rome of its time is a tougher case to make. Is America's military presence in the world excessive? I think the clear answer is yes. Does that make us imperialists. I certainly cannot liken our presence in Japan to that of Britains in India or the Dutch presence in South Africa. These were clearly more oppressive. However, up until recently, our control over the Iraqi government did seem oppressive. When the democratically elected prime minister of an American liberated country has to ask America to leave I believe this means we have over-stayed our welcome.

Teeth - This is a review of a movie about a girl with teeth in her vagina. If that weirds you out, don't read this. Thanks.

No matter what I say about this movie, everyone will grown at the mere premise. It's about a young abstinence preaching girl with teeth in her vagina. Whatever theory I put forth about how this story turns an absurdly sexist urban legend on its ear. It snatches the sexual upper hand from all men and hurls the result in their faces. Most people would laugh at what I've said before and after they have watched this film. They will call it B movie exploitation, which, believe it or not, is not an unfair evaluation. That is what makes this movie so unique. It actually functions as both a stinging satire of male, sexual dominance and a coal black horror comedy.

The film's anti-heroine, Dawn, played by Jess Wexler, is a beautiful young, abstinence preaching high school girl, who has been petrified of her sexuality ever since she bit the end of her step-brother's finger off with her vagina dentata, which she later learns was believed to be a curse by many civilizations that must be conquered by a brave hero's "holy sword." The metaphor and satire are oozing from every chapter of this story, as Dawn's curse becomes less and less of a burden and more a holy weapon of her own. Dawn becomes the great white warrior of female sexuality, and while I hold no personal stake in this battle of the sexual organs, I could not help giving a hell yeah when Dawn realizes the power she holds between her legs, and how it may be used to redeem those she loves and punish those who would take advantage of her innoncence.

If you have a strong enough stomach to withstand some hard-edged violent content (I mean this seriously. I had to break this movie up between two sittings), and you have any interest in horror, exploitation films, feminist theory or cheap thrills, check out "Teeth."

Ghost Cat, Is That You?

Living with cats can often feel like living with ghosts, especially when they learn to open doors. It used to be unsettling to look across the apartment and see a door seemingly open and close by itself, but now it's just like living out the second half of a movie about the Invisible Man and his roommate. I have come to terms with my unusual circumstances, and we have a routine now.

Our apartment is on the second floor of a small house in Bay View on the south side of Milwaukee. Sometimes I hear foot steps on the stairs that lead up to our flat, but when no one materializes at the top of the stairs I realize that,Hegel, named for the 18th century German philosopher, or Murs, named for the twenty-first century gangsta rapper, have had one over on me again. Not that they have any idea what kind of Ghostbusters/Ghost Dad scenarios they create. They only know that they have no yard to run in or wild creatures to hunt. So they hunt each other around our one bedroom apartment, occasionally bumping into a coffee mug or candlestick. When I look to see who is there, all that remains is the spinning cup or a toppled ornament and a spire of smoke. Almost as if some paranormal prankster were trying to make me think I was hallucinating.

"But I'm telling you, officer, someone is lurking around in my home causing all kinds of ruckus. The individual is either incredibly sneaky or returned from the dead to conclude the unfinished business of scaring the begeesus out of me. You don't happen to know if an assistant professor of Art History, overcome with grief over repeated career disappointments, committed suicide in this apartment, because this spook seems to hate my sister-in-law's Pop Art. The same painting has fallen of the wall six times this week. I'm afraid my she is going to notice the wood glue bubbles oozing out of the cracked frame next time she comes over for dinner."

Still, even when I cannot see my feline roommates it is nice to be reminded of their presence by a constant thumping of books being knocked off the book shelf, the scattering of our mail all over the dinner table and surrounding floor or a cry like the restless spirit of an unwanted child thrown off a bridge many years ago.

Hunger

Today I felt a hunger that was not unlike starvation or a hypoglycemic fit, which left me shaking and uneasy--even a little panicked. This is not the first of these episodes I have experienced, and I cannot say why I have never had myself examined by a doctor or at least asked for advice. Being the sensible person I am, I can only reconcile the absurdity of feeling ravenous a mere four hours after breakfast, with a psychological explanation. The idea that I am actually starving being too far-fetched to me. Even hypoglycemia seems to complex an explanation to survive Ockham's discriminant blade.

Regardless, it is at times like these that I find the thought of picky eaters most repulsive. I have no use for those who will altogether reject a particular food because of one single ingredient. I hate raisins. There flavor is completely offensive to my pallet. But if someone offers me oatmeal raisin cookies I will accept with both hands held out, as thankfully as if it were my final communion. I love food. If someone wants to offer me additional options to increase the amount of food I may have for no extra charge I am not going to refuse. I will never conclude a restaurant order with the phrase, "...hold the _____." If they'll add onions or cheese or even fucking sesame seeds for free, I will take them.

In a moment of perceived, irrational trepidation, when I feel that jittery pang wash over me, and my paces begins to clumsily overlap, my mind wanders to the last time I turned down food, not wanting to appear pathetic or greedy to my companions who have forgotten their starving college years. I think of how stupid and overly self conscious I was. If only I had seized the opportunity for a prepared feast, free of charge, I would not be suffering now. I would be satiated and content. Never mind the fact that this probably occurred weeks ago. The satisfaction of that late lunch or late-night snack would have passed, and I would still have this aching in my gut, this hollow-ness. I would still be pawing this very moment at the carb-shaped hole in my soul, longing for the sweat relief of a pita stuffed with lettuce and lamb or a boston cream donut. Oh regret.

Revolver

Today I watched Guy Ritchies latest film, "Revolver". While this movie resembles Ritchie's other works, save "Swept Away," set in the seedy criminal underworld, this time Ritchie adds a Freudian twist. Borrowing the words of many psychologists, who are given exhibition in the credits, Ritchie tells the metaphysical emancipation story of gambler and recent ex-con, Jake, played by Jason Statham, who seems to be good for nothing if he is not in a Ritchie movie. Jake is riding high having made a killing at casinos, since his release from prison. He has spent 7 years solitary confinement--five of those years were spent between the cells of two con men, who play chess and share professional ideas via the pages of prison library books. Jake gets in on the conversation, and, while he gets a grifter's Ph.D. he also shares the location of his nest egg for when he gets out. Two years after his mentors escape prison without him, he returns to the crime boss, Macha, Ray Liotta, whose freedom he maintained by serving time, looking for payback.

Once Jake publicly humiliates Macha and takes him for a large sum, Jake takes a spill and ends up in the hospital where he is diagnosed with a rare blood disease leaving him only weeks to live. Just before the fall Jake was approached by a stranger, Vincent Pastore, offering a prophetic business card. The stranger, after returning to rescue Jake from an ambush, set up by Macha, reveals himself to be a lone shark, who, along with partner, Andre Benjamin, will provide Jake revenge on Macha and protection on the condition that he give them all the money he has.

Revolver is, unsurprisingly, a highly stylized crime/heist movie with strong performances from Pastore, Benjamin and Liotta. Statham also holds his own. Now if he could just deliver this performance to another director, or, at least offer it to a director who deserves it. While all the shine and grime we have come to expect from Guy Ritchie is present, he goes overboard a little with the voices in the head scenes that leave the viewer wondering if they are supposed to recognize two voices or three. Revolver looks at an area of psychology that would sound hokey if it were not within a story of killers and crooks. This grunges up the concept just enough to obscure Madonna's kooky influence on the story.

It's no "Abre Los Ojos," but Revolver succeeds at keeping your attention, while making you think. I suggest a second viewing just to catch up on what you misunderstood the first time through.

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

The most striking feature of "The Curious Case of Benjamin Buttons" is the special effects used to make Brad Pitt look like a seven-year-old boy that looks like an eighty-year-old man. I feel relieved that this story was not attempted by the Sci-Fi Channel or some other third-rate joke of a cable channel. This movie could not have been made ten or even five years ago, at least not without having the mood of the film diluted by hammy CGI. More amazing still is the level to which Brad Pitt performs an impossible role. Sure Mark Hammill had to pretend that he had a laser on the end of that stick, but Brad Pitt had pretend he was a miniature old man, who wanted nothing more than to play like other six-year-olds his own age. I realize I am cramming a lot of contradictions into one paragraph, and if you do not know anything about this movie, check it out before continuing. For those who do know something about this "curious" tale, see this movie. It is visually stunning and heart-breaking--two words often used to describe adaptations of F. Scott Fitzgerald's works, but this is no Great Gatsby. This is surrealist fantasy on the level of H.P. Lovecraft or even Stephen King. And the horror is this tale is not visceral, besides the site of a rinkled newborn, but instead, psychological and metaphysical. I cannot escape the suspicion that this story informed Audrey Neffenegger's The Time Traveler's Wife, which deals with a similar love relationship that is limited by incongruent paths of the character through time. The love story is none-the-less sufficient and satisfying for the purposes of the story.

My one qualm with this story is the event in which the aged Daisy cheats on her husband with Benjamin, when he returns to visit her after a long estrangement. Benjamin returns looking to be in his twenties and actually meets Daisy's daughter and husband. While I can certainly understand the temptation to continue the affair, especially on Daisy's part, considering Brad Pitt looks like he did in Thelma and Louise, a grown woman feeling as if the only way to find closure with the love of her life is to sleep with him, seems terribly naive and immature. It is enough that she will spend the rest of her life loving a man with whom she cannot be, but she has placed an infidelity and a pernicious weight atop her marriage. A weight that cannot help but have a lasting effect on her marital relationship. I guess some would see this as a brave and empowering act carried out by a strong woman, but I cannot see it in that light no matter what angle from which I approach the situation.

One qualm aside this film is worth seeing, if only for the sheer movie magic of it all. This movie captures what is grand and commendably indulgent about cinema. It depicts real emotion and humanity inside a world of fantastic fiction that leaves one dazzled as they exit the cinema.

Slumdog Millionaire

My most prominent thought during Danny Boyle's "Slumdog Millionaire" is that everyone who can get out of India, should. As portrayed in this film, India is a merciless, crime-ridden jungle, where the police and other authorities do nothing to prevent the powerful and corrupt from stealing and ruining everything the weaker might hold dear e.g. friends, family or any monetary wealth accumulated, no matter how small. If someone has the physical strength to take it, they will. Perhaps, I am being naive about the state of my own country. However, I do feel that if I go to work five days a week, I am careful with keeping my belongings and family secure, then I will keep those things and be able to live comfortably and without fear of them all being taken away at the whim of a ruthless criminal. This is simply not the case for Jamal Malik, an Muslim orphan, who is trying to change his Shakespearean tragedy of a life by winning "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?". While the basic premise for this movie does nothing to prepare you for the horror of this boys life, it is anything but a cheesey melodrama.

Jamal has grown up in the slums of Mumbai India alongside his older brother Salim. Jamal and Salim are very troublesome children, always getting into trouble as shown in an early scene reminiscent of "City of God," where they both flee police officers,running in-between shanties, climbing on roofs, assaulting the officers from above and, of course, taunting them ludely. After their Muslim mother is killed by zealous Hindus, the boys quick thinking and resourcefulness saves their lives as they build a gang of "con-children," who scam tourists outside the Taj-Mahal.

Much of the story of Jamal's life is told in order to explain to the police how it is an uneducated kid from the slums has successfully answered the first seven questions on the aforementioned game show--enough questions to earn him 10,000,000 rupees. Since no one else in India has accomplished this feat, police have spent the night after the show, which ran just short of the final question, torturing Jamal in order to get him to confess to cheating.

During the course of Jamal and Salim's treacherous childhood they meet Latika, another child left alone after the Muslim massacre. While Jamal quickly develops feelings for Latika, Salim is sees her as a threat to the bond between he and his brother. Throughout the movie Salim attempts to end Jamal's infatuation, but Jamal refuses to give up hope of being with Latika.

Slumdog Millionaire's love story will capture many people's emotions, but what makes this story most compelling is the way these young children survive at all in such a cruel and unforgiving land like India. For the three main characters, life is brutal, and hope for a safe and comfortable existence is always beyond their reach. While it is obvious early on, Jamal believes that he and Latika were born for each other; as Jamal relays his story to the police, these are the questions Jamal was born to answer.

Who is to blame for America

I was thinking about this 'Letter from 2012,' and I am struck by the insistance that all the horror that is looming over us for our election of Barack Obama (and I stress "our")says nothing of what we Christians have done to get where we are today. It completely ignores our involvment in the shaping of the present United States. Perhaps that is because we have done so very little good. We have elected a president to term twice that only pays us our 'values' lip service. He wins elections on the issues we claim to hold dear, but does nothing to uphold those 'values.' For some time Christians have aligned themselves with the Republican party because of a majority in said party wearing the badge pro-life, pro-marriage and, curiously, self reliance. Why would self-reliance be a Christian virtue? While I personally put a great deal of value on personal responsibility, I do not see it in any Christian creed or scripture. I read proclamation and commandments asking my to put my faith, trust even hope in God. I am continually reminded by scripture that all good things come from God. He will provide. I must surrender my life and "cast all my cares upon him." Does this mean I am a socialist? Not hardly! However, when people are starving, it is no better for the government that represents me to turn a blind eye than it is for me to ignore this deficit.

Was our country founded on Christian principals. As much as Constantinople was. However, the Roman Empire is hardly a model for the body of Christ. At no time was America the Church, and it never will be. In a country with the diversity of America, we cannot hope to maintain our status by giving Christianity special license to run the government. Also, we cannot make people righteous with laws. Ancient Israel was a failed nation, and hardly the example by which we should hold our own nation up against. America will never be what God wanted for Israel for one simple reason. We were not chosen. No matter how much we insist it is so, we cannot make it so by sheer will. We can only foster a people in the body of Christ that will lead and vote for a just government. If our nation is full of Christians the we will be a nation of Christians, but we will not be a Christian nation

Wow, I have not written on here in a while!

I recently read Lord of the Flies by William Golding. I had been told that it influenced the making of the show Lost, of which I am a huge fan. I had already seen the movie, because when I hear about a story that i believe I will like, I often watch the movie, being too impatient to read the book. In this case it was a mistake to watch the film first, because it is so different from the book. I found that my knowledge of the film's story left me overly anxious for particular events that never happened in the book. This made me impatient while reading the book. It made ejoyment of the author's physical description of the landscape and characters nearly impossible.

However, after much frustration I finally latched onto the story itself, and was able to finish it with a profound appreciation of the book apart from the film. The story is about a group of young boys who survive a plane crash and are left to fend for themselves on a desert island. As one might imagine, this is a thrilling prospect for many of the boys: being on an island filled with unknown adventure and absolutely no adults. What unfolds are power struggles, childish irresponsibility and, eventually, brutality that is anything but child's play. The message Golding seems to be presenting is that humanity is brutal even in youth. He is denouncing innocence of the young child, which anyone might claim would produce a more peaceful or utopian society. For Golding, man is selfish and barbaric. Even with the strong and seemingly just leadership of Ralph, even with level headed rationality of Piggy as his adviser, the society will pull free of these at the first sign of weakness. Man will be assuaged by their own interests and the rhetoric of the brash and confident revolutionary to do unspeakable horror to their fellow man, or in this case child.

I agree that this story has likely influenced the writers of Lost. One big similarity, apart from the obvious plane crash on a desert island scenario, is the way the children go back and forth between rational and meta-rational or supernatural explanations of particular events e.g. "the Beast". This element of Lost has always been my favorite part of the show. I particularly like the contrast of the character of "Jack Shepherd" vs. "John Locke". Jack represents the side of science and rationality. While John Locke represents the side of faith and belief in the supernatural, i.e. fate, destiny or God.

Apart from this, I found myself fascinated by the similarity of this utopian experiment put forth by Golding with the experiment of the God of Genesis with Noah. In both cases the greater society is taken out of the picture. Golding hopes to exhibit man's cruelty, even with a fresh start. God is hoping that the new start will give humanity a chance to flourish. I see the wisdom in Golding's effort. However, I am having trouble in finding the wisdom in God's effort. I am certainly struggling with the justice of his experiment. I do not know that I believe It did any good. I am more inclined to agree with Golding that man will create another evil society, than I am with the idea that man will improve by having all but the righteous eliminated.

Having found this odd problem with the story of Noah, I am first inclined to believe that the lesson to be taken from this story is that God will preserve a remnant on earth in the end of time for re-creation or new Earth after judgment. However, I find this to be a valuable lesson only in the case that this story is merely a parable or myth. If it is a true story than I find it more troubling than the story of Job. I am perplexed by this dilemma, and uncertain what to think of it.

Oh, wait! There's more.

I realize that I should probably explain my title a little more. I am unfocused. I cannot decide whether to write a journal, a blog, a book, a movie or a poem. I cannot decide whether to honest or exaggerate in my words here in this blog right now. Therefore I am going to try it all at once. I am going to leave notes, random ideas, and whether I am profound or earnest or honest. I will be me. To that I am committed. Since I could not nail-down my theme I decided to combine two attributes that I believe I struggle to embody simultaneously earnestness and honesty--hence earnesty.

I have been thinking about my love for my friends, my tendency to procrastinate or spontaneously go see a movie alone and my neuroses. The reason I was thinking about them was that they are incompatible, and their incompatibility contributes to my intense need to connect with others on lonely nights. I immediately saw a chance for comedy.

I imagined a guy sitting in a theater alone with food, an iPod and a book. An old girlfriend approaches him joined by a date.
Girl: Steve! Hi, how are you?
Steve: Huh? Oh, I'm fine. (Steve only looks up briefly before returning to his book)
Girl: What are you up to?
Steve: Uh, I'm reading a book, and I'm waiting for the movie to start. (Steve looks annoyed by what seems to him such an obvious question. Girl seems slightly offended, but tries to maintain civility)
Girl: Did you finish school? I haven't heard anything about you.
Steve: Well, we didn't really have any mutual friends. Unless you're stalking me online I don't know how you'd hear anything. I'm not making any headlines.
Girl: O.K...well, are you here alone?
Steve: Well, I was...
Girl: Do you mind if we sit here? (Steve suddenly snaps to attention. He looks around confusedly)
Steve: What do you mean? Aren't you on a date or something? You guys don't exactly look like cousins or anything. (Girl looks embarrassed now. She rubs the back of her neck nervously and does that looking around with her head facing down thing)
Girl: Of course we are. I was just trying to be nice. I mean, you're at a movie...by yourself!
Steve: Look, I see a lot of movies. What kind of asshole would I be if I made my fiancee go to three movies a week?! (Steve makes a really exasperated expression now.)
(Confidence returns to Girl's face briefly and she smiles. Then she looks surprised.)
Girl: Fiancee? You're engaged? Is it happening soon? I mean, when is the wedding?
(Steve's attention has returned to his book.)
Steve: Tuesday. (Steve doesn't even look up as he says this) Listen, I don't need anyone to sit with me. I'm O.K. watching a movie on my own.
Girl: Do you really see three a week?
Steve: Uh, yeah. Something like that. I'm not on a fucking schedule or anything. I just have this thing. It's kind of like a compulsion or addiction, except other people just don't understand...(Steve looks up from his book as if he is thinking to himself) No, it's exactly like an addiction. Except, I don't have to do it. I mean I could stop. I just don't want to. (This time Steve actually looks a little self-conscious, but he quickly disregards it and returns to his book)
Steve: Look, I'm kind of busy. Could you just find some place to sit. I hate running into people in movie theatres. They always want to treat me like some damn charity case. Like I only came alone because I'm lonely. Whatever (Steve returns to his book. Girl looks embarrassed. She stiffens her top lip over her lower.
Girl: Oooo.K. (Girl grabs boys hand and pulls him past Steve and up the stairs. Girl's date looks a little amused. He has a small smirk on his face and goes rather limp as Girl pulls on his arm. Steve continues reading his book)

In the beginning..

I have often thought about writing a blog. I have to admit, part of my anxiety to do so was the name. I carry no pretense that I am the first to comment on this word, "blog." So, I'm not going to make this a post-blogging blog, or even one of those mindless rants of mock-rage that my fiancee, Briana, hates so much. I will move on.
I have avoided blogging because I simply do not know what to blog about. Actually, a few days ago Briana told me she heard on NPR that anyone serious about writing has to blog. Now I enjoy the idea that there is a collective of well informed people around the world, not listening to awful mainstream radio,who heard this broadcast and said, "today is the day I become a writer." I am inspired by the thought of a community of intelligent professionals that talk about how something they heard on public radio changed their lives. It is because of this sentimentality that I am driven to blog today. However, at the same time, cynical about this group of know-it-alls who are probably 'Friends' of the public library and the Nelson Atkins Museum. I hate their smug, overly enthusiastic and way-to-gay voices that respond by phone with a giggle at the "serendipity of the topic discussed by today's guest. The truth is, I cannot which team to choose.

I want to be both the classy and impeccably dressed Bushwood's member and the uncouth white trash caddy, with a perfect swing. I want to play both sides, but not just for both benefits or to double cross one side for the other. I just do not know to which one I am better suited. I am obsessive about punctuation and spelling, and yet I like the way I naturally cut the letter 'g' off the 'ing' ending of a word. I love the dressed-down effortless fashion of torn jeans and a t-shirt, but I hate the look of a suit without a tie. I am perpetually conflicted in my life with the choice between kitsch and class.

Another area of my life, in which all polarizing opposites look appealing is the social world. I recently been considering a writing project about my schizophrenic social preferences. I am both intrigued by the detached loner or hermit, unaffected and stoic as he walks through a culture and society that disgusts and confuses him. I am also drawn to the idea of the high class and well educated socialite, who is plugged into not only his local art but also community. I find that my strong sympathy and profound spiritual calling to the poor means that I must be social and outgoing, instead of reclusive. However, I want to be prepared to take on that world with all its problems, and I feel the only way to be completely prepared is to be well read.

Part of my desire to read I believe comes from the guilt I feel over having squandered much of my education, which I did not appreciate and milk for all it's knowledge, and I am now paying for my apathy by way of one graduate school rejection letter after another. I am scared of the future, and it is my philosophical conflictions that leave me so petrified. I am an existentialist and I am certain that it is all my fault. I have to take responsibility for where I am today. To my credit I have stayed focused enough to convince the most wonderful girl in the world to marry me, but giving girls attention has never really been a problem for me. It is like Nick Hornby says in High Fidelity through the character Rob. Rob explains that he has always been good at remembering the names, birthdays and miscellaneous details of the girls he is interested in, because they are all that he thinks about. This naturally acquired attention to detail has served me well enough to land a great wife, but this fact adds a new difficulty.

Perhaps it is my lingering misogyny that keeps me from being comfortable with the fact that my wife-to-be is much more successful at everything than me. This minor imbalance should really seem like belated justice considering the centuries of male dominated marriages and households, in which a wife accomplished next to nothing unless she was some kind of counter-cultural wonder woman like Virginia Wolf or you were willing to wait until death like Emily Dickinson. I should be fine with the prospect that I may become a regular working stiff doing something I do not like until the right opportunity comes along or becomes possible after proper experience is acquired. I will resign myself to this and keep my eyes and ears open for any spiritual guidance from above, which I probably should have been listening for in the first place.

Well, I do not know if any of my friends or enemies will find this blog. I do not plan on telling anyone about it. I am merely leaving this out there in the great big abyss of cyberspace to float around until I write something profound enough to receive a comment. Maybe I will not even receive that much. But maybe, just maybe I will learn to focus my thoughts better, and maybe my fears and purposes, as well.